According to the standards set out in law, when can a prior inconsistent statement be admitted?

A prior inconsistent statement can be admitted when it is relevant to a decisive issue in the case. The relevance of the statement is crucial because it helps to establish the credibility of the witness or to provide evidence that either supports or contradicts a party's claims. This principle rests on the notion that inconsistencies in a witness's statements can significantly affect the determination of truth in legal proceedings.

In situations where the prior statement addresses key aspects of the case—such as the facts of an incident, the credibility of witness testimony, or other important elements—it can be deemed admissible. This allows the court to consider the full context of the evidence presented, ensuring a fair assessment of the case.

Other factors, such as whether the witness is present at trial or their level of cooperation, do not alone determine the admissibility of the prior inconsistent statement. Instead, the focus must remain on the relevance and its potential impact on the case at hand.