How should the relevance factor from R v Stinchcombe be interpreted?

The relevance factor from R v Stinchcombe should be interpreted widely, taking into account various aspects of evidence. This interpretation aligns with the principle that the disclosure obligations imposed on the Crown are broad in nature. The case established that the Crown must disclose any evidence that is relevant to the case at hand, which includes not only direct evidence that might be used in the prosecution's case but also any evidence that could potentially assist the defense.

This expansive view emphasizes the importance of fairness in legal proceedings, ensuring that the accused is given a fair opportunity to respond to all evidence that may have an impact on their case. By considering various aspects of evidence, the court prioritizes the integrity of the judicial process and protects the rights of the accused.

Focusing narrowly on just core evidence would undermine the thoroughness of the defense's preparation and could prevent critical information from coming to light, which could ultimately affect the outcome of the case.