In which scenario is written examination preferred?

A written examination is preferred in scenarios involving technical cases with some complexity because it allows for a more thorough and organized presentation of evidence and information. In such cases, there are often numerous details and specialized knowledge that need to be articulated clearly. A written format provides the opportunity for the examiner to meticulously prepare questions and for the witness to give well-considered responses. This structured approach ensures that intricate issues are adequately addressed and that the examiner can refer back to the written record for clarity during discussions.

In contrast, straightforward facts may not require the level of detail and clarity that a written examination provides, making oral testimony sufficient. When all parties are present in the courtroom, the immediacy of oral examination can facilitate a more dynamic interaction, and when parties are willing to negotiate, the informal discussions typically don’t necessitate a formal written format. These scenarios are better suited to oral exchanges that allow for flexibility and immediate response.