What does the case R v Grant primarily address?

The case R v Grant primarily addresses the rights of the accused upon detention. In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court of Canada explored the principles associated with the detention of individuals by law enforcement officers and the implications for their rights under section 9 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The ruling emphasized the importance of understanding when a person is deprived of their liberty and how that affects their rights, including the right to be informed of the reasons for the detention and the right to counsel. This case reinforced that the manner in which individuals are detained can significantly impact their rights and the validity of any evidence obtained thereafter.

The other options, while related to broader aspects of criminal law, do not specifically encapsulate the core focus of R v Grant, which is centered on the implications of detention for the accused. For example, while the rights of officers performing arrests and the rules on search and seizure are important considerations in law enforcement, they are not the primary issues addressed in this particular case. Similarly, although gathering evidence legally is crucial in criminal proceedings, the case specifically scrutinizes the rights afforded to the accused during and after the detention process rather than the procedural aspects of evidence collection itself.