What is the review process for the substance of administrative decisions called?

The review process for the substance of administrative decisions is referred to as Substantive Judicial Review. This form of review focuses on assessing whether the decision made by an administrative authority is reasonable and within the bounds of the law, examining the merit and rationale behind the decision itself.

Substantive Judicial Review allows courts to evaluate the appropriateness of the conclusions reached by administrative bodies, ensuring that their decisions uphold the principles of fairness and legality. This type of review is crucial in maintaining checks on administrative power, as it gives citizens recourse to challenge decisions that may be deemed arbitrary or unjust.

In contrast, other types of reviews mentioned do not focus primarily on the substance of decisions. Procedural Review typically assesses whether the proper procedures were followed during the decision-making process, while Administrative Review may encompass various forms of oversight without a strict focus on the substantive legality of the decisions. Judicial Oversight generally refers to a broader concept encompassing both procedural and substantive elements but does not specifically denote the focus on the material content of decisions like Substantive Judicial Review does.