What must the defence do after a directed verdict application if it is not granted?

In the context of a criminal trial, when the defense makes a directed verdict application and it is not granted, the appropriate course of action is to continue with their case. A directed verdict application is a request for the judge to rule that there is insufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find the defendant guilty, thus effectively ending the trial. However, if the judge denies this request, the defense is obliged to move forward and present their evidence and arguments. It is a key aspect of the trial process that allows the defense the opportunity to counter the prosecution's case and provide their own version of events or evidence that may lead to reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors.

Choosing to rest the case immediately would prematurely end the defense's chance to argue on behalf of the defendant. Requesting a plea bargain isn't applicable in this scenario as that is typically negotiated before trial or during specific phases, but not during the trial itself after a directed verdict request. Similarly, making an appeal isn't an option at this juncture, as appeals are conducted after a verdict has been reached and are not a part of trial proceedings. Therefore, the only viable option following a denial of a directed verdict application is for the defense to continue with their case.