Which method allows resolution of claims without a full trial?

The method that allows for the resolution of claims without a full trial is through summary judgment or the determination of questions before trial. Summary judgment is a legal procedure where the court can decide a case or specific issues within a case without the need for a full trial. This occurs when there are no genuine disputes over material facts and one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. By using this method, courts can streamline the process and reduce the time, expense, and resources involved in litigation.

Additionally, the determination of questions before trial can involve pre-trial motions that clarify or resolve issues in the case, further preventing the necessity of a complete trial. This approach is efficient and helps to focus the case, often leading to a quicker resolution.

The other options do not facilitate the same level of case resolution outside of a full trial setting. While jury trials are a common method for adjudicating claims, they do not eliminate the need for a full trial process. Standard hearings may not necessarily resolve all claims either, as they might still require further proceedings. Lastly, discontinuance and withdrawal relate to ending a case but do not serve as a mechanism for resolving claims through judicial decisions.