Which model of spousal support considers the economic disadvantages arising from a marriage or its breakdown?

The correct answer is that all of the models of spousal support—contractual, compensatory, and needs-based—address the economic disadvantages arising from a marriage or its breakdown, albeit in different ways.

The contractual model recognizes the agreements between spouses regarding support, focusing on the terms they may have established through a marriage contract or other agreements. This model considers how these arrangements impact the economic landscape when the marriage ends.

The compensatory model specifically addresses the economic disadvantages one spouse may experience as a result of the marriage or its dissolution. It is designed to compensate a spouse for contributions made during the relationship that may not have been financially compensated, such as staying home to care for children or supporting the other spouse's career. This model directly acknowledges the sacrifices or contributions that lead to financial disparities post-separation.

The needs-based model assesses the financial needs of each spouse after separation, aiming to ensure that both parties can maintain a reasonable standard of living. It looks at the actual financial needs of the individual requesting support and the ability of the other spouse to pay, thus addressing economic disadvantages.

Considering the nuances of how each model operates and their intersections, it is accurate to say that all these approaches consider the economic implications originating from the marriage and its dissolution. Each model