Which of the following could lead a court to reject a judicial review application?

The presence of alternative remedies is a key factor that can lead a court to reject a judicial review application. Judicial review is typically considered a remedy of last resort, meaning that if an applicant has other adequate and accessible legal remedies available to address their grievance, the court may determine that it is inappropriate to proceed with judicial review.

When a court assesses a judicial review application, it looks for whether the case involves issues that can be better resolved through existing legal processes or administrative remedies. If the applicant has other avenues to seek redress, such as an appeal or a complaint process, pursuing those options may be preferred. This principle encourages the use of existing legal frameworks to resolve disputes before resorting to judicial review, which is designed to be an exceptional remedy for specific circumstances, such as challenges against the legality of a decision made by a public authority.

The other factors, like whether the application was timely, the straightforwardness of the issues, and whether the applicant has clean hands, do not inherently disqualify an application for judicial review. In fact, timely submissions and straightforward issues can support the case, while the concept of "clean hands" relates to equitable principles rather than the threshold question of whether to hear a judicial review application.